Original Article https://doi.org/10.70084/mru/pmrcc/00044.P34
Epidemiology of Metabolic Syndrome
in Western Sudan
Eldisugi Hassan Mohammed Humida1,2,3,4, Awad
Abdalla Mohamed5, Ahmed
A. Suliman5, Namarig Alhadi Hamid2, Msaged Adam Edres Mohammed 4,Amal Khalil Yousif Mohammed1,6
Affiliations
1Department of
Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Kordofan, El-Obeid, Sudan; 2EL-Obeid
Teaching Hospital, El-Obeid, Sudan.
3Cardiac
Catheterization Laboratory, EL-Obeid International Hospital, El-Obeid, Sudan.
4Prof Medical
Research Consultancy Center (MRCC), El-Obeid, Sudan.
5Department of
Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Khartoum.
6Aldaman
International Hospital, El-Obeid, Sudan.
Correspondence
to: Eldisugi
Hassan Mohammed Humida, Email:
heldisugi@gmail.com
Cite: Humida, et al. Epidemiology of Metabolic Syndrome in Western Sudan. Medical
Research Updates Journal 2026;4(4):25-35. https://doi.org/10.70084/mru/pmrcc/00044.P34
|
ABSTRACT Background: Metabolic
Syndrome (MetS), associated with hyperinsulinemia and insulin resistance,
represents a significant global health concern. This study aimed to explore
the epidemiology of MetS in Western Sudan. Methodology:
This study is a prospective descriptive clinic-based
investigation conducted at Prof. Medical Complex in Prof. Medical Research
Consultancy Center (Prof. MRCC) located in El-Obeid city, the capital of
North Kordofan State, Sudan, covering the period from January 1, 2025, to
April 3, 2026. We applied the International Diabetes Federation (IDF)
criteria for diagnosing MetS. Results: Men made up
56% of the total, whereas women accounted for 44%. The analysis of waist
circumference (WC) among participants, alongside high-density lipoprotein
cholesterol (HDL-C) and triglyceride (TG) levels, revealed that 5.7%
exhibited abnormalities indicative of metabolic syndrome. Additionally, 28.6%
had low HDL-C levels coupled with high TG levels, while 12.4% presented with
low HDL levels and elevated WC. Individuals exhibiting elevated TG levels and
high WC constituted 7.5% of individuals. The relationship between male sex
and the risk of low HDL-C is demonstrated by a relative risk (RR) of 1.385,
with a 95% confidence interval (95% CI) spanning from 1.178 to 1.628 and a
P-value of <.001. Conclusion: The
prevalence of MetS in Western Sudan was 5.7%, with a notably higher rate
observed in males. The prevalence of low HDL-C levels surpassed global
averages, although it was marginally lower than findings from sub-Saharan
Africa. Hypertriglyceridemia levels aligned with sub-Saharan data and were
slightly elevated compared to the global range. The findings underscore the
necessity for public health interventions, particularly in promoting regular
physical activity and encouraging healthy dietary habits. Keywords: metabolic syndrome; dyslipidemia; hypertriglyceridemia;
low HDL cholesterol; visceral obesity; Sudan. |

Introduction
Metabolic syndrome refers to the
aggregation of several disorders, including central obesity, hypertension,
dyslipidemia, insulin resistance, and type 2 diabetes (T2DM) or impaired
glucose metabolism. Any combination of three of the aforementioned
metabolic disorders can influence the condition. Numerous reports have
associated this shared pathophysiology with the subsequent emergence of
cardiovascular disorders and malignancies [1, 2]. These risk factors greatly
increase CVD risk in multiple ways, making it a public health issue. Vascular
dysfunction, atherosclerosis, oxidative stress, and chronic inflammation caused
by MetS contribute to CVD. Atherosclerosis is caused by dyslipidemia,
specifically excessive triglycerides (TG) and low HDL cholesterol. Chronic
inflammation and oxidative stress worsen hypertension and insulin resistance,
which damage blood vessels. These metabolic disorders require strong lifestyle
changes, including regular exercise and a Mediterranean diet. MetS syndrome is
common worldwide and a major health issue in both developed and developing
nations. It is a precursor to many serious conditions, including cardiovascular-kidney-metabolic
syndrome (CKM), which is a vicious cycle of damage to these vital organs. There
is no clear definition of metabolic syndrome, making it difficult to determine
its regional and global impact. Some studies show prevalence rates of 0.2% to
38.9%. Overweight and obesity, insulin resistance and hyperinsulinemia, high
blood pressure, and dyslipidemia usually precede the syndrome. [3-6]. Previous
studies associate high consumption of whole grains, fruits, and vegetables with
a reduced risk of T2DM and MetS, while increased intake of processed meat, red
meat, and sugar-sweetened beverages correlates with elevated risks of T2DM [7].
Various criteria established by multiple panels and organizations have been
utilized for the diagnosis of MetS. These include the National Cholesterol
Education Program Adult Treatment Panel (NCEP ATP 3), the World Health
Organization (WHO), the European Group for the Study of Insulin Resistance
(EGIR), the International Diabetes Federation (IDF), and the American
Association of Clinical Endocrinologists (AACE) [8]. Information concerning
this MetS from Sudan is scarce. The present study aimed to explore the
epidemiology of MetS in Western Sudan.
Materials and
Methods
A prospective
descriptive clinic-based
study was carried out at Prof. Medical Complex in the Prof. Medical Research
Consultancy Center (Prof. MRCC) located in El-Obeid city, the capital of North
Kordofan State, Sudan, from January 1, 2025, to April 3, 2026. Participants
were included based on their willingness, without considering any demographic
characteristics, from the total visitors to the Prof. MRCC medical complex for
routine medical checkups. Individuals who declined to take part in this series,
along with the exceptionally affluent, were omitted. A well-structured
self-administered questionnaire was employed for data collection.
While diagnosing MetS using various criteria typically necessitates the
presence of three or more of the following factors: We applied the criteria
established by the International Diabetes Federation (IDF) [9] to assess
abdominal obesity, high triglycerides, elevated blood pressure, low HDL
cholesterol, and abnormally high fasting blood glucose levels.
Abdominal obesity: Waist
circumference (WC) exceeding 94 cm in men and 80 cm in women, accompanied by at
least two of the following criteria: (1) Triglycerides (TG) ≥ 150 mg/dl or
treatment for dyslipidemia, (2) HDL cholesterol < 40 mg/dl in men and <
50 mg/dl in women, (3) elevated WC (> 94 cm). In this series, a waist
circumference (WC) greater than 94 cm was considered elevated for both genders,
whereas a high-density lipoprotein (HDL) level below 40 mg/dl was regarded as
deficient for both genders.
Statistical
analysis
We recorded the necessary
information on a data sheet before entering it into the statistical software
package for social science (SPSS) version 31, Chicago, USA. Variables,
frequencies, cross-tabulations, relative risk (RR), and chi-squared were
calculated. A p-value < 0.05 was considered significant.
Results
In this series, we examined 570
cases ranging in age from 12 to 95, with a mean age of 46.8 years and a
standard deviation (SD) of 16.6%. Males accounted for 423/750 (56%) of the
total, while females made up 327/750 (46%). The bulk of the subjects were between
the ages of 50 and 60, followed by 31 to 40 and above 60, with incidence rates
of 183/750 (24%), 21%, and 20%, respectively. As indicated in Table 1 and
Figure 1.
Table 1.
Distribution of the subjects based on their sex and age group.
|
Variable |
Males n=
423 |
Females n=
327 |
Total n=
750 |
|
Age |
|
|
|
|
< 30 years |
74 |
74 |
148 |
|
31-40 |
87 |
70 |
157 |
|
41-49 |
69 |
43 |
112 |
|
50-60 |
106 |
77 |
183 |
|
> 60 |
87 |
63 |
150 |
|
Total |
423 |
327 |
750 |

Figure 1:
Depiction of the subjects based on their sex and age group.
The analysis of participants'
waist circumference (WC) in conjunction with high-density lipoprotein (HDL) and
triglyceride (TG) levels revealed that 43 out of 748 individuals (5.7%)
exhibited abnormalities indicative of metabolic syndrome. Additionally, 214 out
of 748 participants (28.6%) presented with low HDL and elevated TG levels,
while 93 out of 748 participants (12.4%) had low HDL and increased WC.
Individuals with elevated triglyceride levels and high waist circumference
constituted 56 out of 748 (7.5%).
Table 2:
Illustration of the individuals according to their WC, HDL level, and TG level
|
Variable |
Normal WC |
High WC |
Total |
|
Low HDL |
|
|
|
|
Low TG |
261 |
50 |
311 |
|
High TG |
171 |
43 |
214 |
|
Total |
432 |
93 |
525 |
|
Normal HDL |
|
|
|
|
Low TG |
127 |
18 |
145 |
|
High TG |
65 |
13 |
78 |
|
Total |
192 |
31 |
223 |
|
Total HDL |
|
|
|
|
Low TG |
388 |
68 |
456 |
|
High TG |
236 |
56 |
292 |
|
Total |
624 |
124 |
748 |
Most of the individuals in this
study had low HDL levels of 527/750 (70%), with males at 324/527 (61%) and
females at 203/527 (39%). While 99/223 (44% of those with normal HDL levels)
were males, 124/223 (56%) were females. Males have a relative risk (RR) of
1.385 for low HDL-C, with a 95% confidence interval (CI) of 1.178 to 1.628 and
a P-value of <.001. In terms of TG levels, most subjects (457/750, or 61%)
had normal TG levels, with 249/457 (54%) being males and 56% females. While
293/750 (39%) had elevated TG levels, 174/293 (59%) were men, and 41% were
women. The relative risk (RR) of acquiring high TG in males is 0.917, with a
95% confidence interval (95% CI) of 0.809 to 1.041 and a P-value of 0.107. As shown
in Table 3 and Figure 2, most of the participants in this series had normal WC
at 624/748 (83%), with 345/624 (55%) males and 45% females. While 124/748 (17%)
had high WC, 77/124 (62%) were male. The relative risk (RR) of males having a
high WC is 0.890, with a 95% confidence interval (95% CI) ranging from 0.763 to
1.039 and a P-value of 0.097. This trend is clearly seen in Table 3 and Figure
2.
Table 3:
Distribution of the participants according to their sex, HDL level, TG level,
and WC.
|
Variable |
Males n=
423 |
Females n=
327 |
Total n=
750 |
|
HDL level |
|
|
|
|
Low |
324 |
203 |
527 |
|
Normal |
99 |
124 |
223 |
|
Total |
423 |
327 |
750 |
|
TG level |
|
|
|
|
Normal |
249 |
208 |
457 |
|
High |
174 |
119 |
293 |
|
Total |
423 |
327 |
750 |
|
WC |
|
|
|
|
Normal |
345 |
279 |
624 |
|
High |
77 |
47 |
124 |
|
Total |
422 |
326 |
748 |

Figure 2.
Illustration of the participants according to their sex, HDL level, TG level,
and WC.
The bulk of participants with low
HDL values were between the ages of 50 and 60, with > 60- and 31-40 years
accounting for 126/527 (24%), 20.4%, and 20%, respectively. The
majority of people with normal HDL levels are between the ages of 50 and
60, with 57/223 (26%), followed by 31 to 40, with 51 (23%), and under 30 years,
with 48 (22%). The majority of participants with
normal TG levels were between the ages of 50-60, followed by <30 and 31-40
years, with 102/457 (22.3%), 101 (22%), and 94 (21%), respectively. Conversely,
those with high TG levels were mostly between the ages of 50-60 (27.6%) and
31-40 years (64, 21.8%). The most common age category for normal WC is <30
years, followed by 50-60 and 31-40 years, with incidence rates of 142/624
(23%), 140 (22%), and 135 (21.6%), respectively. As shown in Table 4 and Fig.
4, the age group of 50-60 years constitutes the majority of
participants with high WC (42/124, or 34%), followed by 41-49 at 29 (23%).
Table 4
represents the description of the subjects' age, HDL level, and WC.
|
Variable |
< 30
years |
31- 40 |
41- 49 |
50- 60 |
> 60 |
Total |
|
HDL level |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Low |
100 |
106 |
87 |
126 |
108 |
527 |
|
Normal |
48 |
51 |
25 |
57 |
42 |
223 |
|
Total |
148 |
157 |
112 |
183 |
150 |
750 |
|
TG level |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Normal |
101 |
93 |
67 |
102 |
94 |
457 |
|
High |
47 |
64 |
45 |
81 |
56 |
293 |
|
Total |
148 |
157 |
112 |
183 |
150 |
750 |
|
WC |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Normal |
142 |
135 |
83 |
140 |
124 |
624 |
|
High |
6 |
21 |
29 |
42 |
26 |
124 |
|
Total |
148 |
156 |
112 |
182 |
150 |
748 |

Figure 3.
Represents the depiction of the subject's age, HDL level, and WC.
Discussion
The worldwide rise in body weight
and obesity poses a substantial challenge to health organizations at both
regional and global levels, particularly in the prevention of non-communicable
diseases. Metabolic Syndrome (MetS) typically initiates with overweight and
obesity, which precede hyperinsulinemia and insulin resistance. This
subsequently results in T2DM and other metabolic disturbances, including
dyslipidemia. This disorder leads to the future prevalence of atherosclerosis
affecting essential organs, particularly the heart, brain, kidneys, and central
nervous system (CNS). Consequently, the present study offers the first set of
data on MetS in Western Sudan.
The prevalence of MetS in this
cohort was 5.7%. Prior reports from Sudan indicate a prevalence rate of 2.3%.
These studies employ the same criteria as the present study (International
Diabetes Federation criteria); however, the study population consisted of early
adolescents with a mean age of 12.6 ± 1.2 years [6]. A further study from Sudan
involving university students indicates a prevalence of 8.4% according to IDF
standards, 7.5% according to National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP)
Adult Treatment Panel III (ATP III) criteria, and 6.1% according to WHO
criteria [10]. In Sudan, chronic kidney disease populations exhibit a higher
prevalence rate of 19% [11]. About one in five people in the United States has
MetS, and about one in four people in Europe has it. Furthermore, Southeast
Asia exhibits the lowest prevalence rate globally. The intricacy and
interconnections among the elements of MetS, or insulin resistance syndrome,
designate the condition as a priority for several health-related organizations.
Insufficient physical activity and a sedentary lifestyle are considered primary
contributors to the development of visceral obesity and insulin resistance,
which are the foundational elements of MetS. Various literature demonstrates
the significance of diet and nutrients, indicating that a Western diet elevates
the risk of MetS, while Nordic and Mediterranean diets mitigate MetS by
reducing oxidative stress and inflammation, attributed to their high content of
dietary fiber, omega-3 and omega-9 fatty acids, complex carbohydrates,
antioxidants, minerals, and vitamins [12, 13].
The prevalence of low
high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) in this group was 70%, which is
lower than the prevalence in sub-Saharan Africa (77%) and globally (38.4%)
[15].
High-density lipoprotein
cholesterol (HDL-C) serves as the primary mechanism for retrieving low-density
lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol from tissues and transporting it back to the
liver in LDL or very low-density lipoprotein (VLDL) for ultimate processing.
HDL plays a crucial role by including antioxidant properties, anti-inflammatory
effects, and the preservation of arterial endothelial function, which, along
with other factors, is the primary mechanism in the prevention of atheroma
development and the pathogenesis of atherosclerosis. Research indicates that
for every 1 mg/dL rise in HDL-C, there is a 2% to 3% decrease in
atherosclerosis. The studies indicate, by both observational and genetic
analyses, an elevated risk of infectious illnesses, mortality during sepsis,
chronic kidney disease (CKD), and diabetes in persons with low HDL-C levels.
Furthermore, observational studies associate low HDL-C levels with several
autoimmune disorders, cancer, and overall mortality [16-20].
In this study, elevated serum
triglycerides (TG) were seen in 39% of cases. Globally, the prevalence rate of
crude hypertriglyceridemia (HTG) is 29.6% (36.9% in males, 23.8% in women)
[21], but several regions in sub-Saharan Africa have a prevalence above 35%
[22]. Our findings reveal a greater prevalence rate of HTG compared to regional
and worldwide perspectives. These differences may be associated with varying
demographics or the testing methodologies, particularly the sampling methods
during the fasting phase compared to the postprandial phase. While our
protocols employ fasting procedures for lipid profile assessment, several
locations continue to utilize non-fasting approaches, which may lead to
inconsistencies in HTG prevalence rates and affect the accuracy of lipid
measurements, ultimately impacting the reliability of clinical decisions based
on these lipid profiles. HTG has numerous etiologies, some linked to genetics
and others directly associated with an individual's lifestyle, as well as with
other dyslipidemias and metabolic diseases. The deficit of the enzyme
lipoprotein lipase (LPL), which catalyzes the hydrolysis of plasma
triglycerides into free fatty acids and glycerol, is noteworthy. Insulin, an
anabolic hormone, controls LPL activity. When insulin resistance,
hyperinsulinemia, and related metabolic disorders are present, LPL activity is
lower. These conditions will result in HTG and other dyslipidemias observed in
patients with MetS [23-25].
The current study reported
visceral obesity in 17% of participants. Our findings indicate a reduced
prevalence rate compared to earlier publications from Africa, which document a
greater rate [26]. Our findings may be associated with the direct impact of the
2023-armed conflict in Sudan, which resulted in the displacement of millions of
Sudanese individuals, accompanied by a deficiency of food and essential
nutrients, as well as significant emotional repercussions. Visceral obesity is
an escalating epidemic, exacerbated by age, sedentary lifestyles, the adoption
of unhealthy dietary practices, eating frequency, sleep duration, physical
activity levels, and smoking behaviors. It is more common in men; nevertheless,
the frequency will rise in postmenopausal women. The condition signifies the
initial milestone of metabolic syndrome, characterized by insulin resistance
and cardiovascular syndromes, such as acute coronary syndrome, cerebral
atherosclerosis, and peripheral arterial disease. The condition may coexist
with hypertriglyceridemia, leading to the accumulation of free fatty acids and
the release of proinflammatory mediators from adipose tissue, along with
increased synthesis of very-low-density lipoprotein in the liver and decreased
high-density lipoprotein cholesterol. This results in a comprehensive
manifestation of metabolic syndrome that necessitates immediate intervention to
prevent significant vascular damage and debilitating cardiovascular disorders
[27-31]. The current study offers significant preliminary data regarding MetS
in Sudan; yet it possesses certain limitations due to its clinical-based
setting, which restricts the ability to establish causal relationships and may
not fully represent the long-term trends of MetS in the population.
In conclusion, the prevalence of
MetS in Western Sudan was 5.7%, with a significantly elevated rate in males.
The prevalence of low HDL-C levels exceeded global averages but was slightly
lower than findings from sub-Saharan Africa. Hypertriglyceridemia levels
corresponded with sub-Saharan data and were marginally increased relative to
the global range. The results highlight the imperative for public health
initiatives, especially in advocating for consistent physical activity and
fostering nutritious eating practices.
Acknowledgments
The authors extended their
sincere gratitude to the people at Prof. Medical Research Consultancy Center
(Prof. MRCC) for their invaluable assistance concerning the data collection.
Ethical
Approval: The Prof. Medical Research Consultancy Center's Human
Research Ethics Committee (HREC) has approved the study proposal. (Approval #:
HREC 0022/MRCC.1/25)
Conflict of
interest: The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Data
availability: Data regarding this study are available from
the corresponding author.
Author’s
contributions
All the authors have reviewed the
publishable version of the manuscript and agreed on the final work.
Humida EHM: Concept and design, Acquisition,
analysis, or interpretation of the data, Drafting of the manuscript, and
Supervision
Mohamed AA: Concept and design, Drafting of
the manuscript, Critical review of the manuscript for important intellectual
content, Visualization and validation.
Suliman AA: Concept and design, Critical
review of the manuscript for important intellectual content, Drafting of the
manuscript, Visualization and validation
Hamid NA: Acquisition, analysis, or
interpretation of the data, Drafting of the manuscript, software and
validation.
Edres MA: Acquisition, analysis, or
interpretation of the data, Drafting of the manuscript, investigation and
methodology.
Mohammed AKY: Concept and design,
Acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of the data ,drafting of the
manuscript, visualization and critical review of the manuscript for important
intellectual content.
References
1. Loson-Kawalec M, Sawina P, Kowalczyk A, et al. Metabolic
Syndrome in Focus: Emerging Causes, New Diagnostic Approaches and Criteria, and
Long-Term Health Consequences. Cureus. 2026 Jan 7;18(1):e101012. doi:
10.7759/cureus.101012. PMID: 41658698.
2. Hamooya BM, Siame L, Muchaili L, Masenga SK and Kirabo A.
Metabolic syndrome: epidemiology, mechanisms, and current therapeutic
approaches. Front. Nutr. 2025;12:1661603. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2025.1661603
3. Madan K, Paliwal S, Sharma S, Kesar S, Chauhan N, Madan M.
Metabolic Syndrome: The Constellation of Co-morbidities, A Global Threat.
Endocr Metab Immune Disord Drug Targets. 2023;23(12):1491-1504. doi:
10.2174/1871530323666230309144825. PMID: 36892127.
4. Ndumele CE, Rangaswami J, Chow SL, et al.
Cardiovascular-Kidney-Metabolic Health: A Presidential Advisory From the
American Heart Association. Circulation. 2023 Nov 14;148(20):1606-1635. doi:
10.1161/CIR.0000000000001184. Erratum in: Circulation. 2024 Mar
26;149(13):e1023. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000001241. PMID: 37807924.
5. Pigeot I, Ahrens W. Epidemiology of metabolic syndrome.
Pflugers Arch. 2025 May;477(5):669-680. doi: 10.1007/s00424-024-03051-7. PMID:
39862247.
6. Elfaki FA, Mukhayer AIG, Moukhyer ME, Chandika RM, Kremers
SPJ. Prevalence of Metabolic Syndrome among Early Adolescents in Khartoum
State, Sudan. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Nov 11;19(22):14876. doi:
10.3390/ijerph192214876. PMID: 36429592.
7. Banjarnahor RL, Javadi Arjmand E, Onni AT, et al. Umbrella
Review of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses on Consumption of Different Food
Groups and Risk of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus and Metabolic Syndrome. J Nutr.
2025 May;155(5):1285-1297.
8. Yasir HE, Tahir OA, Leena BM, Imam SN. Metabolic syndrome and
its association with obesity and lifestyle factors in Sudanese population.
Diabetes Metab Syndr. 2016 Jul-Sep;10(3):128-31. doi:
10.1016/j.dsx.2016.01.002. PMID: 26968774.
9. Melissa Miranda and Alejandro Alonso Altamirano. Metabolic
syndrome in adults: Diagnostic criteria. World Journal of Biology Pharmacy and
Health Sciences 2025 September 30. DOI:10.30574/wjbphs.2025.23.3.0879
10. Sabir FS, Ismaeil M. Prevalence of Metabolic Syndrome Among
Sudanese Young University Students Using Three Different Criteria of WHO, IDF
and NCEP-ATP III.: PP084. Echocardiography 2015 Nov;32:A40.
11. Noor SK, Hamid S, Abdelgeyoom AE, et al. The prevalence of
metabolic syndrome among adult patients with chronic kidney disease: an
overlooked problem in Sudan. Journal of Public Health and Emergency. 2022 Jun
25;6.
12. Rochlani Y, Pothineni NV, Kovelamudi S, Mehta JL. Metabolic
syndrome: pathophysiology, management, and modulation by natural compounds.
Ther Adv Cardiovasc Dis. 2017 Aug;11(8):215-225. doi: 10.1177/1753944717711379.
PMID: 28639538.
13. Dayi T, Ozgoren M. Effects of the Mediterranean diet on the
components of metabolic syndrome. J Prev Med Hyg. 2022 Oct 17;63(2 Suppl
3):E56-E64. doi: 10.15167/2421-4248/jpmh2022.63.2S3.2747. PMID: 36479500.
14. Greiner R, Nyirenda M, Rodgers L, et al. Associations
between low HDL, sex and cardiovascular risk markers are substantially
different in sub-Saharan Africa and the UK: analysis of four population
studies. BMJ Global Health 2021;6:e005222.
https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2021-005222.
15. Ballena-Caicedo J, Zuzunaga-Montoya FE, Loayza-Castro JA, et
al. Global prevalence of dyslipidemias in the general adult population: a
systematic review and meta-analysis. J Health Popul Nutr. 2025 Aug
26;44(1):308. doi: 10.1186/s41043-025-01054-3. PMID: 40859400.
16. Rezkalla SH, Kloner RA. Low HDL-The Challenge. Clin Med Res.
2025 Aug;23(2):60-66. doi: 10.3121/cmr.2025.1970. PMID: 40813253.
17. Bonilha I, Luchiari B, Nadruz W, Sposito AC. Very low HDL
levels: clinical assessment and management. Arch Endocrinol Metab. 2023 Jan
18;67(1):3-18. doi: 10.20945/2359-3997000000585. PMID: 36651718.
18. Van Name JP, Sharma S. Low HDL Cholesterol. 2025 Aug 2. In:
StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2026 Jan–.
PMID: 32809584.
19. Feingold KR. Lipid and Lipoprotein Metabolism. Endocrinol
Metab Clin North Am. 2022 Sep;51(3):437-458. doi: 10.1016/j.ecl.2022.02.008.
PMID: 35963623.
20. von Eckardstein A, Nordestgaard BG, Remaley AT, Catapano AL.
High-density lipoprotein revisited: biological functions and clinical
relevance. Eur Heart J. 2023 Apr 21;44(16):1394-1407. doi:
10.1093/eurheartj/ehac605. PMID: 36337032.
21. Ruiz-García A, Arranz-Martínez E, López-Uriarte B, et al.
Prevalence of hypertriglyceridemia in adults and related cardiometabolic
factors. SIMETAP-HTG study. Clin Investig Arterioscler. 2020
Nov-Dec;32(6):242-255. English, Spanish. doi: 10.1016/j.arteri.2020.04.001.
Epub 2020 Jun 10. PMID: 32534728.
22. Angassa, D., Solomon, S. & Seid, A. Factors associated
with dyslipidemia and its prevalence among Awash wine factory employees, Addis
Ababa, Ethiopia: a cross-sectional study. BMC Cardiovasc Disord 2022;22.
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12872-022-02465-4
23. Baass A, Paquette M, Lam O, Hofer K, Collet J, McClain MR.
Prevalence, incidence, and definition of severe hypertriglyceridemia: A
comprehensive review and weighted summary. J Clin Lipidol. 2025
Nov-Dec;19(6):1550-1563. doi: 10.1016/j.jacl.2025.08.012. PMID: 41073238.
24. Fujino Y, Yasuda-Yamahara M, Tanaka-Sasaki Y, et al. Limited
effects of systemic or renal lipoprotein lipase deficiency on renal physiology
and diseases. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2022 Sep 10;620:15-20. doi:
10.1016/j.bbrc.2022.06.067. PMID: 35772212.
25. Vlacho B, Julve J, Genua I, et al. Hypertriglyceridemia and
its relationship with all-cause mortality and pancreatitis: Results from a
large retrospective clinical registry. J Clin Lipidol. 2025
Jul-Aug;19(4):922-930. doi: 10.1016/j.jacl.2025.04.195. PMID: 40467441.
26. Malik SK, Kouame J, Gbane M, Coulibaly M, Ake MD, Ake O.
Prevalence of abdominal obesity and its correlates among adults in a peri-urban
population of West Africa. AIMS Public Health. 2019 Sep 23;6(3):334-344. doi:
10.3934/publichealth.2019.3.334. PMID: 31637282.
27. Olinto MTA, Theodoro H, Canuto R. Epidemiology of Abdominal
Obesity [Internet]. Adiposity—Epidemiology and Treatment Modalities. InTech;
2017. https://doi.org/10.5772/65342
28. Kong M, Xu M, Zhou Y, et al. Assessing Visceral Obesity and
Abdominal Adipose Tissue Distribution in Healthy Populations Based on Computed
Tomography: A Large Multicenter Cross-Sectional Study. Front Nutr. 2022 Apr
25;9:871697. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2022.871697. PMID: 35548570.
29. Saito K, Shimamoto T, Takahashi Y, et al. Gender-specific
factors contributing to visceral obesity, including the sleep-obesity
relationship: a large-scale cross-sectional study from East Asia. Sci Rep. 2022
Nov 24;12(1):20318. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-24863-6. PMID: 36434061.
30. Tchernof A, Després JP. Pathophysiology of human visceral
obesity: an update. Physiol Rev. 2013 Jan;93(1):359-404. doi:
10.1152/physrev.00033.2011. PMID: 23303913.
31. Ahmed SK, Mohammed RA. Obesity: Prevalence, causes,
consequences, management, preventive strategies, and future research
directions. Metabol Open. 2025 Jun 14;27:100375. doi:
10.1016/j.metop.2025.100375. PMID: 41041606.