Original Article   https://doi.org/10.70084/mru/pmrcc/00044.P34

Epidemiology of Metabolic Syndrome in Western Sudan

 Eldisugi Hassan Mohammed Humida1,2,3,4, Awad Abdalla Mohamed5, Ahmed A. Suliman5, Namarig Alhadi Hamid2,  Msaged Adam Edres Mohammed 4,Amal Khalil Yousif Mohammed1,6

Affiliations

1Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Kordofan, El-Obeid, Sudan; 2EL-Obeid Teaching Hospital, El-Obeid, Sudan.

3Cardiac Catheterization Laboratory, EL-Obeid International Hospital, El-Obeid, Sudan.

4Prof Medical Research Consultancy Center (MRCC), El-Obeid, Sudan.

5Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Khartoum.

6Aldaman International Hospital, El-Obeid, Sudan.

Correspondence to: Eldisugi Hassan Mohammed Humida, Email: heldisugi@gmail.com

Cite: Humida, et al. Epidemiology of Metabolic Syndrome in Western Sudan. Medical Research Updates Journal 2026;4(4):25-35. https://doi.org/10.70084/mru/pmrcc/00044.P34

ABSTRACT

Background: Metabolic Syndrome (MetS), associated with hyperinsulinemia and insulin resistance, represents a significant global health concern. This study aimed to explore the epidemiology of MetS in Western Sudan. Methodology: This study is a prospective descriptive clinic-based investigation conducted at Prof. Medical Complex in Prof. Medical Research Consultancy Center (Prof. MRCC) located in El-Obeid city, the capital of North Kordofan State, Sudan, covering the period from January 1, 2025, to April 3, 2026. We applied the International Diabetes Federation (IDF) criteria for diagnosing MetS. Results: Men made up 56% of the total, whereas women accounted for 44%. The analysis of waist circumference (WC) among participants, alongside high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) and triglyceride (TG) levels, revealed that 5.7% exhibited abnormalities indicative of metabolic syndrome. Additionally, 28.6% had low HDL-C levels coupled with high TG levels, while 12.4% presented with low HDL levels and elevated WC. Individuals exhibiting elevated TG levels and high WC constituted 7.5% of individuals. The relationship between male sex and the risk of low HDL-C is demonstrated by a relative risk (RR) of 1.385, with a 95% confidence interval (95% CI) spanning from 1.178 to 1.628 and a P-value of <.001. Conclusion: The prevalence of MetS in Western Sudan was 5.7%, with a notably higher rate observed in males. The prevalence of low HDL-C levels surpassed global averages, although it was marginally lower than findings from sub-Saharan Africa. Hypertriglyceridemia levels aligned with sub-Saharan data and were slightly elevated compared to the global range. The findings underscore the necessity for public health interventions, particularly in promoting regular physical activity and encouraging healthy dietary habits.

Keywords: metabolic syndrome; dyslipidemia; hypertriglyceridemia; low HDL cholesterol; visceral obesity; Sudan.

 

 

Introduction


Metabolic syndrome refers to the aggregation of several disorders, including central obesity, hypertension, dyslipidemia, insulin resistance, and type 2 diabetes (T2DM) or impaired glucose metabolism. Any combination of three of the aforementioned metabolic disorders can influence the condition. Numerous reports have associated this shared pathophysiology with the subsequent emergence of cardiovascular disorders and malignancies [1, 2]. These risk factors greatly increase CVD risk in multiple ways, making it a public health issue. Vascular dysfunction, atherosclerosis, oxidative stress, and chronic inflammation caused by MetS contribute to CVD. Atherosclerosis is caused by dyslipidemia, specifically excessive triglycerides (TG) and low HDL cholesterol. Chronic inflammation and oxidative stress worsen hypertension and insulin resistance, which damage blood vessels. These metabolic disorders require strong lifestyle changes, including regular exercise and a Mediterranean diet. MetS syndrome is common worldwide and a major health issue in both developed and developing nations. It is a precursor to many serious conditions, including cardiovascular-kidney-metabolic syndrome (CKM), which is a vicious cycle of damage to these vital organs. There is no clear definition of metabolic syndrome, making it difficult to determine its regional and global impact. Some studies show prevalence rates of 0.2% to 38.9%. Overweight and obesity, insulin resistance and hyperinsulinemia, high blood pressure, and dyslipidemia usually precede the syndrome. [3-6]. Previous studies associate high consumption of whole grains, fruits, and vegetables with a reduced risk of T2DM and MetS, while increased intake of processed meat, red meat, and sugar-sweetened beverages correlates with elevated risks of T2DM [7]. Various criteria established by multiple panels and organizations have been utilized for the diagnosis of MetS. These include the National Cholesterol Education Program Adult Treatment Panel (NCEP ATP 3), the World Health Organization (WHO), the European Group for the Study of Insulin Resistance (EGIR), the International Diabetes Federation (IDF), and the American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists (AACE) [8]. Information concerning this MetS from Sudan is scarce. The present study aimed to explore the epidemiology of MetS in Western Sudan.


Materials and Methods


A prospective descriptive clinic-based study was carried out at Prof. Medical Complex in the Prof. Medical Research Consultancy Center (Prof. MRCC) located in El-Obeid city, the capital of North Kordofan State, Sudan, from January 1, 2025, to April 3, 2026. Participants were included based on their willingness, without considering any demographic characteristics, from the total visitors to the Prof. MRCC medical complex for routine medical checkups. Individuals who declined to take part in this series, along with the exceptionally affluent, were omitted. A well-structured self-administered questionnaire was employed for data collection.
While diagnosing MetS using various criteria typically necessitates the presence of three or more of the following factors: We applied the criteria established by the International Diabetes Federation (IDF) [9] to assess abdominal obesity, high triglycerides, elevated blood pressure, low HDL cholesterol, and abnormally high fasting blood glucose levels.

Abdominal obesity: Waist circumference (WC) exceeding 94 cm in men and 80 cm in women, accompanied by at least two of the following criteria: (1) Triglycerides (TG) ≥ 150 mg/dl or treatment for dyslipidemia, (2) HDL cholesterol < 40 mg/dl in men and < 50 mg/dl in women, (3) elevated WC (> 94 cm). In this series, a waist circumference (WC) greater than 94 cm was considered elevated for both genders, whereas a high-density lipoprotein (HDL) level below 40 mg/dl was regarded as deficient for both genders.

Statistical analysis

We recorded the necessary information on a data sheet before entering it into the statistical software package for social science (SPSS) version 31, Chicago, USA. Variables, frequencies, cross-tabulations, relative risk (RR), and chi-squared were calculated. A p-value < 0.05 was considered significant.


Results


In this series, we examined 570 cases ranging in age from 12 to 95, with a mean age of 46.8 years and a standard deviation (SD) of 16.6%. Males accounted for 423/750 (56%) of the total, while females made up 327/750 (46%). The bulk of the subjects were between the ages of 50 and 60, followed by 31 to 40 and above 60, with incidence rates of 183/750 (24%), 21%, and 20%, respectively. As indicated in Table 1 and Figure 1.


Table 1. Distribution of the subjects based on their sex and age group.

Variable

Males n= 423

Females n= 327

Total n= 750

Age

 

 

 

< 30 years

74

74

148

31-40

87

70

157

41-49

69

43

112

50-60

106

77

183

 > 60

87

63

150

Total

423

327

750

 

Figure 1: Depiction of the subjects based on their sex and age group.


The analysis of participants' waist circumference (WC) in conjunction with high-density lipoprotein (HDL) and triglyceride (TG) levels revealed that 43 out of 748 individuals (5.7%) exhibited abnormalities indicative of metabolic syndrome. Additionally, 214 out of 748 participants (28.6%) presented with low HDL and elevated TG levels, while 93 out of 748 participants (12.4%) had low HDL and increased WC. Individuals with elevated triglyceride levels and high waist circumference constituted 56 out of 748 (7.5%).


Table 2: Illustration of the individuals according to their WC, HDL level, and TG level

 

Variable

Normal WC

High WC

Total

Low HDL

 

 

 

Low TG

261

50

311

High TG

171

43

214

Total

432

93

525

Normal HDL

 

 

 

Low TG

127

18

145

High TG

65

13

78

Total

192

31

223

Total HDL

 

 

 

Low TG

388

68

456

High TG

236

56

292

Total

624

124

748

 


Most of the individuals in this study had low HDL levels of 527/750 (70%), with males at 324/527 (61%) and females at 203/527 (39%). While 99/223 (44% of those with normal HDL levels) were males, 124/223 (56%) were females. Males have a relative risk (RR) of 1.385 for low HDL-C, with a 95% confidence interval (CI) of 1.178 to 1.628 and a P-value of <.001. In terms of TG levels, most subjects (457/750, or 61%) had normal TG levels, with 249/457 (54%) being males and 56% females. While 293/750 (39%) had elevated TG levels, 174/293 (59%) were men, and 41% were women. The relative risk (RR) of acquiring high TG in males is 0.917, with a 95% confidence interval (95% CI) of 0.809 to 1.041 and a P-value of 0.107. As shown in Table 3 and Figure 2, most of the participants in this series had normal WC at 624/748 (83%), with 345/624 (55%) males and 45% females. While 124/748 (17%) had high WC, 77/124 (62%) were male. The relative risk (RR) of males having a high WC is 0.890, with a 95% confidence interval (95% CI) ranging from 0.763 to 1.039 and a P-value of 0.097. This trend is clearly seen in Table 3 and Figure 2.


Table 3: Distribution of the participants according to their sex, HDL level, TG level, and WC.

Variable

Males n= 423

Females n= 327

Total n= 750

HDL level

 

 

 

Low

324

203

527

Normal

99

124

223

Total

423

327

750

TG level

 

 

 

Normal

249

208

457

High

174

119

293

Total

423

327

750

WC

 

 

 

Normal

345

279

624

High

77

47

124

Total

422

326

748

 

Figure 2. Illustration of the participants according to their sex, HDL level, TG level, and WC.


The bulk of participants with low HDL values were between the ages of 50 and 60, with > 60- and 31-40 years accounting for 126/527 (24%), 20.4%, and 20%, respectively. The majority of people with normal HDL levels are between the ages of 50 and 60, with 57/223 (26%), followed by 31 to 40, with 51 (23%), and under 30 years, with 48 (22%). The majority of participants with normal TG levels were between the ages of 50-60, followed by <30 and 31-40 years, with 102/457 (22.3%), 101 (22%), and 94 (21%), respectively. Conversely, those with high TG levels were mostly between the ages of 50-60 (27.6%) and 31-40 years (64, 21.8%). The most common age category for normal WC is <30 years, followed by 50-60 and 31-40 years, with incidence rates of 142/624 (23%), 140 (22%), and 135 (21.6%), respectively. As shown in Table 4 and Fig. 4, the age group of 50-60 years constitutes the majority of participants with high WC (42/124, or 34%), followed by 41-49 at 29 (23%).


Table 4 represents the description of the subjects' age, HDL level, and WC.

Variable

< 30 years

31- 40

41- 49

50- 60

> 60

Total

HDL level

 

 

 

 

 

 

Low

100

106

87

126

108

527

Normal

48

51

25

57

42

223

Total

148

157

112

183

150

750

TG level

 

 

 

 

 

 

Normal

101

93

67

102

94

457

High

47

64

45

81

56

293

Total

148

157

112

183

150

750

WC

 

 

 

 

 

 

Normal

142

135

83

140

124

624

High

6

21

29

42

26

124

Total

148

156

112

182

150

748

 

 

Figure 3. Represents the depiction of the subject's age, HDL level, and WC.

 Discussion


The worldwide rise in body weight and obesity poses a substantial challenge to health organizations at both regional and global levels, particularly in the prevention of non-communicable diseases. Metabolic Syndrome (MetS) typically initiates with overweight and obesity, which precede hyperinsulinemia and insulin resistance. This subsequently results in T2DM and other metabolic disturbances, including dyslipidemia. This disorder leads to the future prevalence of atherosclerosis affecting essential organs, particularly the heart, brain, kidneys, and central nervous system (CNS). Consequently, the present study offers the first set of data on MetS in Western Sudan.

The prevalence of MetS in this cohort was 5.7%. Prior reports from Sudan indicate a prevalence rate of 2.3%. These studies employ the same criteria as the present study (International Diabetes Federation criteria); however, the study population consisted of early adolescents with a mean age of 12.6 ± 1.2 years [6]. A further study from Sudan involving university students indicates a prevalence of 8.4% according to IDF standards, 7.5% according to National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) Adult Treatment Panel III (ATP III) criteria, and 6.1% according to WHO criteria [10]. In Sudan, chronic kidney disease populations exhibit a higher prevalence rate of 19% [11]. About one in five people in the United States has MetS, and about one in four people in Europe has it. Furthermore, Southeast Asia exhibits the lowest prevalence rate globally. The intricacy and interconnections among the elements of MetS, or insulin resistance syndrome, designate the condition as a priority for several health-related organizations. Insufficient physical activity and a sedentary lifestyle are considered primary contributors to the development of visceral obesity and insulin resistance, which are the foundational elements of MetS. Various literature demonstrates the significance of diet and nutrients, indicating that a Western diet elevates the risk of MetS, while Nordic and Mediterranean diets mitigate MetS by reducing oxidative stress and inflammation, attributed to their high content of dietary fiber, omega-3 and omega-9 fatty acids, complex carbohydrates, antioxidants, minerals, and vitamins [12, 13].

The prevalence of low high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) in this group was 70%, which is lower than the prevalence in sub-Saharan Africa (77%) and globally (38.4%) [15].

High-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) serves as the primary mechanism for retrieving low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol from tissues and transporting it back to the liver in LDL or very low-density lipoprotein (VLDL) for ultimate processing. HDL plays a crucial role by including antioxidant properties, anti-inflammatory effects, and the preservation of arterial endothelial function, which, along with other factors, is the primary mechanism in the prevention of atheroma development and the pathogenesis of atherosclerosis. Research indicates that for every 1 mg/dL rise in HDL-C, there is a 2% to 3% decrease in atherosclerosis. The studies indicate, by both observational and genetic analyses, an elevated risk of infectious illnesses, mortality during sepsis, chronic kidney disease (CKD), and diabetes in persons with low HDL-C levels. Furthermore, observational studies associate low HDL-C levels with several autoimmune disorders, cancer, and overall mortality [16-20].

In this study, elevated serum triglycerides (TG) were seen in 39% of cases. Globally, the prevalence rate of crude hypertriglyceridemia (HTG) is 29.6% (36.9% in males, 23.8% in women) [21], but several regions in sub-Saharan Africa have a prevalence above 35% [22]. Our findings reveal a greater prevalence rate of HTG compared to regional and worldwide perspectives. These differences may be associated with varying demographics or the testing methodologies, particularly the sampling methods during the fasting phase compared to the postprandial phase. While our protocols employ fasting procedures for lipid profile assessment, several locations continue to utilize non-fasting approaches, which may lead to inconsistencies in HTG prevalence rates and affect the accuracy of lipid measurements, ultimately impacting the reliability of clinical decisions based on these lipid profiles. HTG has numerous etiologies, some linked to genetics and others directly associated with an individual's lifestyle, as well as with other dyslipidemias and metabolic diseases. The deficit of the enzyme lipoprotein lipase (LPL), which catalyzes the hydrolysis of plasma triglycerides into free fatty acids and glycerol, is noteworthy. Insulin, an anabolic hormone, controls LPL activity. When insulin resistance, hyperinsulinemia, and related metabolic disorders are present, LPL activity is lower. These conditions will result in HTG and other dyslipidemias observed in patients with MetS [23-25].

The current study reported visceral obesity in 17% of participants. Our findings indicate a reduced prevalence rate compared to earlier publications from Africa, which document a greater rate [26]. Our findings may be associated with the direct impact of the 2023-armed conflict in Sudan, which resulted in the displacement of millions of Sudanese individuals, accompanied by a deficiency of food and essential nutrients, as well as significant emotional repercussions. Visceral obesity is an escalating epidemic, exacerbated by age, sedentary lifestyles, the adoption of unhealthy dietary practices, eating frequency, sleep duration, physical activity levels, and smoking behaviors. It is more common in men; nevertheless, the frequency will rise in postmenopausal women. The condition signifies the initial milestone of metabolic syndrome, characterized by insulin resistance and cardiovascular syndromes, such as acute coronary syndrome, cerebral atherosclerosis, and peripheral arterial disease. The condition may coexist with hypertriglyceridemia, leading to the accumulation of free fatty acids and the release of proinflammatory mediators from adipose tissue, along with increased synthesis of very-low-density lipoprotein in the liver and decreased high-density lipoprotein cholesterol. This results in a comprehensive manifestation of metabolic syndrome that necessitates immediate intervention to prevent significant vascular damage and debilitating cardiovascular disorders [27-31]. The current study offers significant preliminary data regarding MetS in Sudan; yet it possesses certain limitations due to its clinical-based setting, which restricts the ability to establish causal relationships and may not fully represent the long-term trends of MetS in the population.

In conclusion, the prevalence of MetS in Western Sudan was 5.7%, with a significantly elevated rate in males. The prevalence of low HDL-C levels exceeded global averages but was slightly lower than findings from sub-Saharan Africa. Hypertriglyceridemia levels corresponded with sub-Saharan data and were marginally increased relative to the global range. The results highlight the imperative for public health initiatives, especially in advocating for consistent physical activity and fostering nutritious eating practices.

 Acknowledgments

The authors extended their sincere gratitude to the people at Prof. Medical Research Consultancy Center (Prof. MRCC) for their invaluable assistance concerning the data collection.

Ethical Approval: The Prof. Medical Research Consultancy Center's Human Research Ethics Committee (HREC) has approved the study proposal. (Approval #: HREC 0022/MRCC.1/25)

Conflict of interest: The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Data availability: Data regarding this study are available from the corresponding author.

Author’s contributions

All the authors have reviewed the publishable version of the manuscript and agreed on the final work.

Humida EHM: Concept and design, Acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of the data, Drafting of the manuscript, and Supervision 

Mohamed AA: Concept and design, Drafting of the manuscript, Critical review of the manuscript for important intellectual content, Visualization and validation.

Suliman AA: Concept and design, Critical review of the manuscript for important intellectual content, Drafting of the manuscript, Visualization and validation

Hamid NA: Acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of the data, Drafting of the manuscript, software and validation.

Edres MA: Acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of the data, Drafting of the manuscript, investigation and methodology.

Mohammed AKY: Concept and design, Acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of the data ,drafting of the manuscript, visualization and critical review of the manuscript for important intellectual content.



References


1.     Loson-Kawalec M, Sawina P, Kowalczyk A, et al. Metabolic Syndrome in Focus: Emerging Causes, New Diagnostic Approaches and Criteria, and Long-Term Health Consequences. Cureus. 2026 Jan 7;18(1):e101012. doi: 10.7759/cureus.101012. PMID: 41658698.

2.     Hamooya BM, Siame L, Muchaili L, Masenga SK and Kirabo A. Metabolic syndrome: epidemiology, mechanisms, and current therapeutic approaches. Front. Nutr. 2025;12:1661603. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2025.1661603

3.     Madan K, Paliwal S, Sharma S, Kesar S, Chauhan N, Madan M. Metabolic Syndrome: The Constellation of Co-morbidities, A Global Threat. Endocr Metab Immune Disord Drug Targets. 2023;23(12):1491-1504. doi: 10.2174/1871530323666230309144825. PMID: 36892127.

4.     Ndumele CE, Rangaswami J, Chow SL, et al. Cardiovascular-Kidney-Metabolic Health: A Presidential Advisory From the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2023 Nov 14;148(20):1606-1635. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000001184. Erratum in: Circulation. 2024 Mar 26;149(13):e1023. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000001241. PMID: 37807924.

5.     Pigeot I, Ahrens W. Epidemiology of metabolic syndrome. Pflugers Arch. 2025 May;477(5):669-680. doi: 10.1007/s00424-024-03051-7. PMID: 39862247.

6.     Elfaki FA, Mukhayer AIG, Moukhyer ME, Chandika RM, Kremers SPJ. Prevalence of Metabolic Syndrome among Early Adolescents in Khartoum State, Sudan. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Nov 11;19(22):14876. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192214876. PMID: 36429592.

7.     Banjarnahor RL, Javadi Arjmand E, Onni AT, et al. Umbrella Review of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses on Consumption of Different Food Groups and Risk of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus and Metabolic Syndrome. J Nutr. 2025 May;155(5):1285-1297.

8.     Yasir HE, Tahir OA, Leena BM, Imam SN. Metabolic syndrome and its association with obesity and lifestyle factors in Sudanese population. Diabetes Metab Syndr. 2016 Jul-Sep;10(3):128-31. doi: 10.1016/j.dsx.2016.01.002. PMID: 26968774.

9.     Melissa Miranda and Alejandro Alonso Altamirano. Metabolic syndrome in adults: Diagnostic criteria. World Journal of Biology Pharmacy and Health Sciences 2025 September 30. DOI:10.30574/wjbphs.2025.23.3.0879

10.   Sabir FS, Ismaeil M. Prevalence of Metabolic Syndrome Among Sudanese Young University Students Using Three Different Criteria of WHO, IDF and NCEP-ATP III.: PP084. Echocardiography 2015 Nov;32:A40.

11.   Noor SK, Hamid S, Abdelgeyoom AE, et al. The prevalence of metabolic syndrome among adult patients with chronic kidney disease: an overlooked problem in Sudan. Journal of Public Health and Emergency. 2022 Jun 25;6.

12.   Rochlani Y, Pothineni NV, Kovelamudi S, Mehta JL. Metabolic syndrome: pathophysiology, management, and modulation by natural compounds. Ther Adv Cardiovasc Dis. 2017 Aug;11(8):215-225. doi: 10.1177/1753944717711379. PMID: 28639538.

13.   Dayi T, Ozgoren M. Effects of the Mediterranean diet on the components of metabolic syndrome. J Prev Med Hyg. 2022 Oct 17;63(2 Suppl 3):E56-E64. doi: 10.15167/2421-4248/jpmh2022.63.2S3.2747. PMID: 36479500.

14.   Greiner R, Nyirenda M, Rodgers L, et al. Associations between low HDL, sex and cardiovascular risk markers are substantially different in sub-Saharan Africa and the UK: analysis of four population studies. BMJ Global Health 2021;6:e005222. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2021-005222.

15.   Ballena-Caicedo J, Zuzunaga-Montoya FE, Loayza-Castro JA, et al. Global prevalence of dyslipidemias in the general adult population: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Health Popul Nutr. 2025 Aug 26;44(1):308. doi: 10.1186/s41043-025-01054-3. PMID: 40859400.

16.   Rezkalla SH, Kloner RA. Low HDL-The Challenge. Clin Med Res. 2025 Aug;23(2):60-66. doi: 10.3121/cmr.2025.1970. PMID: 40813253.

17.   Bonilha I, Luchiari B, Nadruz W, Sposito AC. Very low HDL levels: clinical assessment and management. Arch Endocrinol Metab. 2023 Jan 18;67(1):3-18. doi: 10.20945/2359-3997000000585. PMID: 36651718.

18.   Van Name JP, Sharma S. Low HDL Cholesterol. 2025 Aug 2. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2026 Jan–. PMID: 32809584.

19.   Feingold KR. Lipid and Lipoprotein Metabolism. Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am. 2022 Sep;51(3):437-458. doi: 10.1016/j.ecl.2022.02.008. PMID: 35963623.

20.   von Eckardstein A, Nordestgaard BG, Remaley AT, Catapano AL. High-density lipoprotein revisited: biological functions and clinical relevance. Eur Heart J. 2023 Apr 21;44(16):1394-1407. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehac605. PMID: 36337032.

21.   Ruiz-García A, Arranz-Martínez E, López-Uriarte B, et al. Prevalence of hypertriglyceridemia in adults and related cardiometabolic factors. SIMETAP-HTG study. Clin Investig Arterioscler. 2020 Nov-Dec;32(6):242-255. English, Spanish. doi: 10.1016/j.arteri.2020.04.001. Epub 2020 Jun 10. PMID: 32534728.

22.   Angassa, D., Solomon, S. & Seid, A. Factors associated with dyslipidemia and its prevalence among Awash wine factory employees, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia: a cross-sectional study. BMC Cardiovasc Disord 2022;22. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12872-022-02465-4

23.   Baass A, Paquette M, Lam O, Hofer K, Collet J, McClain MR. Prevalence, incidence, and definition of severe hypertriglyceridemia: A comprehensive review and weighted summary. J Clin Lipidol. 2025 Nov-Dec;19(6):1550-1563. doi: 10.1016/j.jacl.2025.08.012. PMID: 41073238.

24.   Fujino Y, Yasuda-Yamahara M, Tanaka-Sasaki Y, et al. Limited effects of systemic or renal lipoprotein lipase deficiency on renal physiology and diseases. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2022 Sep 10;620:15-20. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2022.06.067. PMID: 35772212.

25.   Vlacho B, Julve J, Genua I, et al. Hypertriglyceridemia and its relationship with all-cause mortality and pancreatitis: Results from a large retrospective clinical registry. J Clin Lipidol. 2025 Jul-Aug;19(4):922-930. doi: 10.1016/j.jacl.2025.04.195. PMID: 40467441.

26.   Malik SK, Kouame J, Gbane M, Coulibaly M, Ake MD, Ake O. Prevalence of abdominal obesity and its correlates among adults in a peri-urban population of West Africa. AIMS Public Health. 2019 Sep 23;6(3):334-344. doi: 10.3934/publichealth.2019.3.334. PMID: 31637282.

27.   Olinto MTA, Theodoro H, Canuto R. Epidemiology of Abdominal Obesity [Internet]. Adiposity—Epidemiology and Treatment Modalities. InTech; 2017. https://doi.org/10.5772/65342

28.   Kong M, Xu M, Zhou Y, et al. Assessing Visceral Obesity and Abdominal Adipose Tissue Distribution in Healthy Populations Based on Computed Tomography: A Large Multicenter Cross-Sectional Study. Front Nutr. 2022 Apr 25;9:871697. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2022.871697. PMID: 35548570.

29.   Saito K, Shimamoto T, Takahashi Y, et al. Gender-specific factors contributing to visceral obesity, including the sleep-obesity relationship: a large-scale cross-sectional study from East Asia. Sci Rep. 2022 Nov 24;12(1):20318. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-24863-6. PMID: 36434061.

30.   Tchernof A, Després JP. Pathophysiology of human visceral obesity: an update. Physiol Rev. 2013 Jan;93(1):359-404. doi: 10.1152/physrev.00033.2011. PMID: 23303913.

31.   Ahmed SK, Mohammed RA. Obesity: Prevalence, causes, consequences, management, preventive strategies, and future research directions. Metabol Open. 2025 Jun 14;27:100375. doi: 10.1016/j.metop.2025.100375. PMID: 41041606.