Leprosy in Sudan:
What is the current situation? |
Authors Rogeia
Mahmoud Niyle1,2, Jalila Abd algader Salium3,
Mahmed Salah Eltahir4, Badr aldin Ajaber4, Hussain Gadelkarim Ahmed5,6 |
Affiliations 1Faculty
of Medicine, University of Kordofan, El-Obeid, Sudan. 2Abas
health medical company, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. 3Kordofan
Histopathology Center, El-Obeid, Sudan. 4Neglected
tropical diseases, Federal Ministry of Health Sudan, Khartoum,
Sudan. 5Prof.
Medical Research Consultancy Center, NK, El-Obeid,
Sudan. 6Department
of Histopathology and Cytology, FMLS, University of Khartoum, Khartoum, Sudan. Abstract |
Edited By: Abdelbaset Mohamed Elasbali Jouf University, Saudi Arabia Reviewed by:
- Amal Khalil Yousif University of Kordofan, Sudan - Hisham Sherfi Bon Secours Hospital, Irland Correspondence
to: Rogeia Mahmoud niyle. Email: rogeiamahmoud123@gmail.com Received on:22/5/2025
Accepted on:
28/6/2025 Published on:
5-7-2025 Citation: Niyle et al. Leprosy in Sudan: What is the current situation?. Medical Research Updates Journal 2025; 3(2): 21-30. doi.org/10.70084/mruj.0003.P332. |
Background: Leprosy is a
communicable disease that remains a neglected global health concern. Leprosy
is a contagious skin disease that continues to pose a chronic public health
issue in Sudan. This research aimed to analyze the
household connections of leprosy patients in North Kordofan state during the
period from 2020 to 2021. Methodology:
This prospective, descriptive, community-based study was
conducted in El-Obeid city, focusing on all households that interacted with
leprotic patients between November 2020 and July 2021. The study has 116
cases (total coverage). Aside from the questionnaire, clinical examinations
and skin smears for microscopic investigation were conducted. Results: One hundred
sixteen household contacts of forty leprotic patients were investigated. Most
of the participants, comprising 57% females and 60% of the studied
individuals, were uneducated. Additionally, most resided in rural areas and
had not engaged in any form of employment. The prevalence of leprosy among
contacted households was 16.4% for multibacillary cases. 89.5% of newly
diagnosed patients had multibacillary leprosy, with a male predominance of
63% over females. Most were residents in rural areas, accounting for 68.4%. Conclusion: The
present study concluded that household contacts with leprotic patients
require close attention for early diagnosis to prevent the transmission of
the disease and to implement control measures effectively. Raising awareness
of at-risk communities is essential for effective infection control. |