Original Article doi.org/10.70084/mruj.0041.P141
Association between Education level and
personal hygiene among displaced individuals during the Sudan war 2023-2026
Sabreen
MohammedALmaki AlBahi
MohammedALmaki1, Abdalmajeed Mohammed Alhafez Abdalbagi2, Esraa
Ismail Mohamed Hamatalla2, Haitham
Abdalla Ali Ismail3, Eldaw Breima Suliman Mohamed4, Mohamed
Mahgoub Hassan Khalifa5, Afnan
Eldaw Breima suliman4, Ahmed
Elnour Adam Zakaria2,6, Osman
Abdlgadir7, Hussain
Gadelkarim Ahmed1,8
Affiliations
1Prof Medical Research Consultancy
Center, El-Obeid, Sudan. 2El-Obeid Teaching Hospital, El-Obeid,
Sudan. 3Obstetrics and Gynecology Department, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences,
University of Kordofan, El-Obeid, Sudan. 4Sheikan College, El-Obeid,
Sudan.5Department of Histopathology and Cytology, Faculty of Medical
Laboratory Sciences, University of Kordofan, El-Obeid, NK, Sudan.6University
of Health, North Kordofan branch, El-Obeid, Sudan.7Patients Helping
Fund Organization (PHF), El-Obeid, Sudan.8Department of
Histopathology and Cytology, FMLS, University of Khartoum, Sudan.
Cite: MohammedALmaki MA, et al. Association between
Education level and personal hygiene among displaced individuals during the Sudan
war 2023-2026.Medical Research Updates Journal 2026;4(1):1-9. doi.org/10.70084/mruj.0041.P141
|
ABSTRACT |
|
Background: The complex interplay of physical, social, and
psychological factors in refugee camps can significantly impair individuals'
personal hygiene. Therefore, the present study aimed to assess the
association between education level and personal hygiene among displaced
individuals during the Sudanese war (2023–2026). Methodology: This inquiry was a cross-sectional survey conducted in
El-Obeid City, the capital of North Kordofan State, Sudan. Approximately 550
participants were randomly chosen for this study, irrespective of demographic
criteria. The chosen contributions were selected from approximately 4000
displaced families. Results: Out of 550 participants, 40.2% were illiterate, 53.2%
had basic education, 3.8% had university, and 2.7% had other education.
Participants were asked, "Do you wash your hands with soap?" 7.6%
said "No." 8.6% of 42 participants were illiterate, 6.8% had basic
education, 4.8% had university degrees, and 2/15 (13.3%) were others. 36.2%
said “No” to “Are handwashing tools available?” Out of 199 participants,
35.7% were illiterate, 36.9% basic, 33.3% university, and 33.3% others. Only
4% said “No” to “Do you maintain self-hygiene when sick?", with 3.6%
illiterate and 4.8% basic. 31.2% said "No" to "Do you have
hygiene tools available during illness?" comprising 28% illiterates,
33.4% basic, 33.3% university, and 33.3% others. Conclusion: Academic education affects personal hygiene habits in
refugee camps, but factors like community conditions, available resources,
and how well educational programs work can make this relationship more
complicated, as shown by the different answers about hygiene tool
availability from people with various education levels. |
|
Keywords: Personal
hygiene, displaced people, refugee, war, Sudan |
Introduction
Personal
hygiene is considered important due to the aging of the world population and
the immunocompromised nature of most elderly people [1, 2]. Most personal
hygiene influencing factors are those linked to skin and oral care measures.
Although these factors are important, their sustainable implementation is
challenging in most settings [1].
Daily skin
care habits are essential components of proper personal hygiene practices. The
provision of skin care, encompassing cleaning and the application of leave-on
products, significantly influences the prevention and treatment of many skin
disorders. Numerous unique studies exist about skin dangers, classifications,
problems, prevention, and therapy [3].
By the end of
2024, an estimated 123.2 million individuals had been forced to leave their
homes because of war and persecution. Eighty percent of them lived in low- and
middle-income nations [4]. Refugees often have decreased personal hygiene due
to restricted access to sufficient water, sanitation, and hygiene (WASH)
facilities, resulting in heightened risks of waterborne diseases such as
cholera and diarrhea. Although a
majority of refugees engage in daily bathing (64.2%) and nail care,
considerable obstacles remain, including infrequent handwashing with soap
(typically below 50–60% compliance) and insufficient access to clean water [4].
As of April
15, 2023, the ongoing armed conflict in Sudan has profoundly impacted millions,
leading to widespread displacement, severe food insecurity, and significant
educational challenges that necessitate urgent humanitarian assistance [5].
Internally
displaced people live in very poor, crowded conditions with few facilities.
These conditions make it harder to get the main tools for personal hygiene,
such as soap, clean water, and sanitary products, which are essential for
maintaining health and preventing disease. Hygiene problems for displaced
people in Sudan are big because of many things, including war. Many displaced
people don't have access to clean, safe drinking water. In refugee camps, there
aren't enough sanitation facilities, like toilets and waste disposal systems.
There is often limited access to soap, sanitary products, and other hygiene
supplies. Improving hygiene among displaced populations is important for their
overall health and well-being. To solve these problems, research is needed to
provide information for coordinated efforts from governments, NGOs, and
humanitarian organizations, particularly focusing on the specific needs and
challenges faced by displaced populations in maintaining hygiene standards.
Therefore, the present study aimed to assess the association between education
level and personal hygiene among displaced individuals during the Sudan war in
2023–2026.
Materials
Methods
This was a
cross-sectional survey conducted in El-Obeid City, the capital of North
Kordofan State, Sudan. About 550 participants were randomly selected for this
study regardless of any demographic characteristics. The selected contributors
were enrolled in about 4000 displaced families. All families were sequentially
registered, and the participating families were selected by starting with the
number 1 and adding 7 repeatedly until reaching 4000, which ultimately resulted
in selecting 550 families.
A purposeful
Arabic questionnaire was designed and used to collect information regarding
personal hygiene practices during the interview. The most common variables were
included.
The most
common variables included hand hygiene, oral hygiene, bathing, nail care, hair
care, clothing, foot care, menstrual hygiene, and hygiene during illness, hygiene,
and hygiene during illness. One of the authors conducted the interview with the
responding participants.
Data Analysis
All
questionnaires were initially filled in on a data sheet, then entered into a computer software statistical package for the
social sciences (SPSS). IBM version 27) for analysis. Frequencies, percentages,
and cross-tabulations were calculated.
Results
This study
assessed the personal hygiene among 550 Sudanese women aged 7 to 100 years,
with a mean age of 31. Of the 550 participants, 221 (40.2%) were
illiterate, 293 (53.2%) had a basic education level, 21 (3.8%) had a university
level, and 15 (2.7%) had other educational means. When asking the participants, "Do you use soap when washing
hands?” 42/550 (7.6%) replied "No." Of 42 participants, 19/221 (8.6%)
were illiterate, 20/293 (6.8%) had basic education, 1/21 (4.8%) had university
education, and 2/15 (13.3%) were in other categories. Regarding the question,
"Are hand-washing tools available?" 199/550 (36.2%) claimed
"no." Of the 199 participants, 79/221 (35.7%) were illiterate,
108/293 (36.9%) were basic, 7/21 (33.3%) were university, and 5/15 (33.3%) were
others. Regarding the question “Do you maintain self-hygiene when sick?"
only 22/550 (4%) responded as "No," of whom 8/221 (3.6%) were
illiterate and 14/293 (4.8%) basic. The question asked was, “Do you have
hygiene tools available during illness?" 172/550 (31.2%) stated
"No," including 62/221 (28%) illiterates, 98/293 (33.4%) basic, 7/21
(33.3%) university, and 5/15 (33.3%) others, as indicated in Table 1 and Fig.
1.
Table 1.
Distribution of the study participants by
education level and personal hygiene regarding handwashing habits
|
Variable |
Illiterate n=221 |
Basic n=293 |
University n=21 |
Other n=15 |
Total n=550 |
|
Do you use soap when washing
hands |
|
|
|||
|
Yes |
157 |
217 |
16 |
8 |
398 |
|
No |
19 |
20 |
1 |
2 |
42 |
|
Sometimes |
45 |
56 |
4 |
5 |
110 |
|
Are hands washing tools
available? |
|
|
|
||
|
Yes |
83 |
100 |
10 |
2 |
195 |
|
No |
79 |
108 |
7 |
5 |
199 |
|
Sometimes |
59 |
85 |
4 |
8 |
156 |
|
Do you maintain self-hygiene
when sick |
|
|
|
||
|
Yes |
202 |
260 |
19 |
13 |
494 |
|
No |
8 |
14 |
0 |
0 |
22 |
|
Sometimes |
11 |
19 |
2 |
2 |
34 |
|
Do you have hygiene tools
available during illness |
|
|
|||
|
Yes |
113 |
122 |
11 |
6 |
252 |
|
No |
62 |
98 |
7 |
5 |
172 |
|
Sometimes |
46 |
75 |
3 |
4 |
126 |

Figure
1. Description
of the participants by proportions of self-hygiene according to education
level.
Table 2, Fig.
2, summarizes the distribution of the study participants by education level and
oral care. Only 4/550 (0.07%) rarely clean their teeth regularly. About 47
(8.5%) don’t use toothpaste at all, and 33 (6%) use it sometimes. Of the 47 who
don’t use toothpaste, 16/221 (7.2%) were illiterate, and 25/293 (8.5%) had a
basic education. Total unavailability of oral care tools was indicated by
190/550 (34.5%), and sometimes available for 91/550 (16.5%).
Table 2.
Distribution of the study participants by
education level and oral care
|
Variable |
Illiterate n=221 |
Basic n=293 |
Graduated n=21 |
Other n=15 |
Total n=550 |
|
How many times do you clean
your teeth daily |
|
|
|||
|
Once |
19 |
42 |
4 |
2 |
58 |
|
Twice |
135 |
253 |
13 |
6 |
319 |
|
>Two |
66 |
137 |
4 |
7 |
170 |
|
Rarely |
1 |
3 |
0 |
0 |
4 |
|
Do you use
toothbrush and toothpaste? |
|
|
|
||
|
Yes |
193 |
250 |
17 |
11 |
471 |
|
No |
16 |
25 |
2 |
3 |
46 |
|
Sometimes |
12 |
18 |
2 |
1 |
33 |
|
Do you
have oral care tools available |
|
|
|
||
|
Yes |
107 |
144 |
12 |
6 |
269 |
|
No |
86 |
94 |
6 |
4 |
190 |
|
Sometimes |
28 |
55 |
3 |
5 |
91 |

Figure
2. Description of the study participants by
education level and oral care
Table 3 summarizes the distribution of the study
participants by education level and body care. About 433/550 (78.7%)
participants claimed that they bathed twice or more per day. However, around
118/550 (21.5%) indicated that they don’t use soap in most instances. Out of
the 118 participants, 46/221 (20.8%) were illiterate, and 64/293 (21.8%) had basic
education. About 23 (4.2%) don’t wash their hair within a month, of whom 18/23
(78.3%) are either illiterate or have a basic education.
Table 3.
Distribution of the study participants by
education level and body care
|
Variable |
Illiterate n=221 |
Basic n=293 |
Graduated n=21 |
Other n=15 |
Total n=550 |
|
How many
times do you bath per day |
|
|
|||
|
Once |
40 |
58 |
8 |
4 |
110 |
|
Twice |
135 |
170 |
6 |
5 |
316 |
|
More |
45 |
60 |
6 |
6 |
117 |
|
I don’t
bath |
1 |
2 |
1 |
0 |
4 |
|
Twice a
week |
0 |
3 |
0 |
0 |
3 |
|
Do you use
soap and other bathing tools |
|
|
|||
|
Yes |
175 |
229 |
17 |
11 |
432 |
|
No |
13 |
23 |
2 |
2 |
40 |
|
Sometimes |
33 |
41 |
2 |
2 |
78 |
|
How many
times do you wash your hair per month |
|
|
|
||
|
Once |
28 |
48 |
5 |
3 |
84 |
|
Twice |
67 |
69 |
4 |
5 |
145 |
|
More |
99 |
150 |
8 |
5 |
262 |
|
I don’t
wash |
7 |
11 |
4 |
1 |
23 |
|
Once in a week |
17 |
12 |
0 |
1 |
30 |
|
Twice in a
week |
3 |
2 |
0 |
0 |
5 |
|
twice in a
day |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
|
Do you use
hair care tools |
|
|
|
||
|
Yes |
180 |
232 |
19 |
9 |
440 |
|
No |
38 |
50 |
2 |
4 |
94 |
|
Sometimes |
3 |
22 |
0 |
2 |
16 |
|
Do you
share hair removal tools with others |
|
|
|||
|
Yes |
18 |
35 |
3 |
2 |
58 |
|
No |
197 |
256 |
17 |
9 |
479 |
|
Sometimes |
6 |
2 |
1 |
4 |
13 |
|
Do you
regularly trim and clean your nails |
|
|
|
||
|
Yes |
217 |
280 |
21 |
15 |
533 |
|
No |
2 |
4 |
0 |
0 |
6 |
|
Sometimes |
2 |
9 |
0 |
0 |
11 |
|
How many
times do you wash your feet daily |
|
|
|||
|
Rarely |
7 |
5 |
0 |
0 |
12 |
|
Once |
34 |
34 |
1 |
1 |
70 |
|
Twice |
54 |
74 |
6 |
2 |
136 |
|
5 times |
87 |
121 |
11 |
7 |
226 |
|
More |
39 |
59 |
3 |
5 |
106 |
Table 4 summarizes the distribution of
the study participants by education level, washing clothes, and disposing of
waste. Most participants wash their clothes twice a week, followed by those who
wash them more than twice, those who wash them once, and those who wash them
less than once, depending on the availability of water and soap; these groups
represent 267 (48.5%), 169 (30.7%), 62 (11.3%), and 52 (9.5%), respectively.
The distribution is relatively similar among different education levels.
Table 4. Distribution of the study participants by education
level, washing clothes, and disposing of waste
|
Variable |
Illiterate n=221 |
Basic n=293 |
Graduated n=21 |
Other n=15 |
Total n=550 |
|
How many
times do you wash your clothes weekly |
|
|
|||
|
Once |
21 |
38 |
2 |
1 |
62 |
|
Twice |
109 |
145 |
9 |
4 |
267 |
|
More |
79 |
79 |
5 |
8 |
169 |
|
Water
& Soap |
12 |
33 |
5 |
2 |
52 |
|
Do you
face difficulties disposing of used tools |
|
|
|
||
|
Not sure |
49 |
19 |
1 |
4 |
73 |
|
Yes |
133 |
189 |
16 |
10 |
348 |
|
No |
39 |
84 |
4 |
1 |
128 |
|
Sometimes |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
Discussion
The Sudan
armed conflict from 2023 to 2026 has led to a devastating crisis all over the
country. Many people have lost their properties and homes. Almost half of the
population is currently displaced internally or externally. The
majority of internally displaced people are living in refugee camps with
scarce facilities. Such conditions result in a poor health environment, which
facilitates a drop in personal hygiene. However, there are no available
measures for personal hygiene among these internally displaced people in Sudan,
which is important for helping such people at the governmental level or NGOs.
Consequently, the present study assessed the influence of education levels on
personal hygiene practices.
Regarding
washing hands using soap, the findings of the present study indicated that the
best personal hygiene practices increase with an elevated education level.
However, regarding the availability of personal hygiene tools, the measures are
relatively similar at all education levels, indicating that regardless of
education, access to tools like soap and sanitizers does not significantly
differ among individuals. Although we didn’t come across a study that precisely
assessed the impact of the education level on personal hygiene, studies done
among education clusters proved that personal hygiene practices are strongly
enhanced by elevated levels of education and certain health education targets
[7].
Concerning
oral hygiene, the findings of the current study revealed that the great
majority of the participants maintain satisfactory oral health practices. Most
oral health issues can be prevented and addressed early. Dental caries (tooth
decay), periodontal disorders (gum diseases), tooth loss, and oral malignancies
(cancers of the mouth) are the most common. Orofacial clefts, noma (severe oral gangrenous disease, usually affecting
youngsters), and oro-dental injuries are also public
health issues. The prevalence of oral illnesses is rising internationally due
to urbanization and changes in the living environment. Insufficient fluoride
exposure, high-sugar diet availability, and limited access to dental health
care services are the main causes. The promotion of sugary foods, tobacco, and
alcohol has increased the consumption of products that contribute to oral
health disorders and other diseases, particularly among low-income populations
who may lack access to healthier alternatives and education about nutrition.
Oral illnesses disproportionately affect the poor and socially disadvantaged.
Socioeconomic status (income, occupation, and education) strongly correlates
with the prevalence and severity of oral diseases. This link persists among
populations in high-, middle-, and low-income countries from early childhood to
old age [8].
The findings
of the present study showed that most displaced people are taking reasonable
care of their bodies, but this care is somewhat insufficient due to a lack of
water, soap, and difficulty in maintaining privacy. The maintenance of body
care and personal hygiene within refugee camps constitutes a crucial aspect of
humanitarian aid, serving as a fundamental measure to avert the spread of
disease in densely populated and resource-constrained settings. The issues of
overcrowding, limited access to clean water, and inadequate sanitation pose
considerable risks, making the promotion of hygiene, the distribution of
supplies, and the maintenance of facilities essential for safeguarding health
and preserving dignity [9-11].
Camp refugees
positively correlate academic education and personal hygiene. Higher education
often enhances hygiene and health awareness. Individuals with higher education
recognize the significance of personal hygiene in preventing disease. Formal
education typically fosters exemplary hygiene practices such as handwashing and
waste disposal. Education can enhance communal cleanliness practices by
altering mindsets, leading to increased awareness and adoption of hygiene
standards within communities. Educated individuals may possess superior health
and hygiene resources, enabling them to inform their communities. They may also
utilize health services more effectively. Higher education may enhance
involvement in cleanliness and health initiatives within NGOs and assistance
organizations, fostering community-wide improvements in hygiene practices. They
can advocate for hygiene within their communities [12].
In conclusion,
academic education influences personal hygiene practices in refugee camps;
however, community circumstances, resource availability, and the efficacy of
educational programs may complicate this relationship. Improvement of refugee
hygiene necessitates a holistic approach
to addressing these factors.
Acknowledgement
The author would like to
thank all participants for their cooperation, as well as the staff at Prof
Medical Research Consultancy Center, who assisted in data collection.
Funding
The
Prof. Medical Research Consultancy Center (PMRCC) funded this project. Grant
Number: PMRCC/2024A5.
Conflict of Interest
The
author declares that they have no conflict of interest to disclose.
Ethical Considerations
Ethical
approval was obtained from the local government authorities, and administrative
authorization was received before data collection. The study adhered to the
principles of confidentiality and responsible use of routinely collected health
information.
Ethical Approval
The
protocol of this study had been approved by the Human Ethics Committee at Prof
MRCC. Approval number: HREC 00012/MRCC.1/26).
Disclosure
This
research was conducted without the use of artificial intelligence or assisted
technologies, including the generation of figures.
Data Availability
The
data supporting the conclusions of this article are included within the
article, and further inquiries can be sent to the corresponding author.
References
1-
Heague M, Dyson J, Cowdell F. Barriers
and facilitators to delivering everyday personal hygiene care in residential
settings: A systematic review. J Clin Nurs. 2023 Jul;32(13-14):3102-3116. doi: 10.1111/jocn.16413.
2-
Tran Van Hoi E, De Glas NA, Portielje
JEA, Van Heemst D, Van Den Bos F, Jochems SP, Mooijaart SP. Biomarkers of the ageing immune system and
their association with frailty - A systematic review. Exp Gerontol.
2023 Jun 1;176:112163. doi:
10.1016/j.exger.2023.112163.
3-
Fastner A, Hauss A, Kottner J. Skin assessments and
interventions for maintaining skin integrity in nursing practice: An umbrella
review. Int J Nurs Stud. 2023 Jul;143:104495. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2023.104495.
4-
Yitageasu G, Asnake AA, Gebrehana AK, Kase BF, Asebe HA, Tigabie M, Demoze L. Burden of
scabies in displacement settings: A systematic review and meta-analysis among
forcibly displaced populations. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2025 Dec 23;19(12):e0013853.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0013853.
5-
Maneesh P, & Vinu, N. A Cross-sectional Study on
Morbidity Prevalence, Sanitation and Hygienic Behaviour of Sri Lankan Tamil
Refugees in Tamil Nadu. Migration and Development 2025. https://doi.org/10.1177/21632324251357058
6-
Dominguez GB, Sharma N, Mahmoud L, Dahab
M, Bedri N, Bhutta ZA. Who protects the children and women of Sudan? Lancet
Child Adolesc Health. 2025 Oct;9(10):735-743. doi: 10.1016/S2352-4642(25)00237-8.
7-
Minda GH, Tola HH, Amhare AF, Kebie A, Endale T. Personal hygiene practice and
associated factors among elementary school students in Fiche Town, Oromia,
Ethiopia. BMC Infect Dis. 2024 Aug 5;24(1):781. doi:
10.1186/s12879-024-09665-7.
8-
WHO. Oral Health 17 March. Available at:
https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/oral-health#:~:text=Oral%20diseases%2C%20while%20largely%20preventable,coverage%20(UHC)%20benefit%20packages.
Accessed on 4 Feb. 2026.
9-
Qayum M, Adil AH,
Usman U, Rehman W, Khan M, Khan TA. Bathing and cleaning practices in the camp
of Jalozai Pakistan, for internally displaced people, based on Sphere Standards
and Indicators. J Pak Med Assoc. 2011;61(12):1169-1172.
10-
Calderón-Villarreal A, Schweitzer R,
Kayser G. Social and geographic inequalities in water, sanitation and hygiene
access in 21 refugee camps and settlements in Bangladesh, Kenya, Uganda, South
Sudan, and Zimbabwe. Int J Equity Health. 2022 Feb 19;21(1):27. doi: 10.1186/s12939-022-01626-3. Erratum in: Int J Equity
Health. 2022 May 10;21(1):64. doi:
10.1186/s12939-022-01671-y.
11-
Pérez-Sales P, Galán-Santamarina A, Zunzunegui MV, López-Martin S. Refugee Camps as Torturing
Environments-An Analysis of the Conditions in the Moria Reception Center
(Greece) Based on the Torturing Environment Scale. Int J Environ Res Public
Health. 2022 Aug 17;19(16):10233. doi:
10.3390/ijerph191610233.
12-
GBD 2023 Disease and Injury and Risk
Factor Collaborators. Burden of 375 diseases and injuries, risk-attributable
burden of 88 risk factors, and healthy life expectancy in 204 countries and
territories, including 660 subnational locations, 1990-2023: a systematic
analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2023. Lancet. 2025 Oct
18;406(10513):1873-1922. doi:
10.1016/S0140-6736(25)01637-X.